What are the chances--even or astronomical?
Stephen Hawkings, the most lovable physicist since Albert
Einstein, was born on the 300th anniversary of Galileo’s death, and
died this Wednesday, March 14—Einstein’s birthday. See the obit.
I’ve often enough struck by coincidences. I’ll be reading, and
I’ll be struck by a word, say fatuity,
and let it linger on my lips, savoring it, and a second after pronouncing aloud
I’ll hear it on TV—a pundit scoffing at the fatuity
of a particular politician.
Everyone has such experiences, with varying degrees of regularity.
They happen to me all the time: a word or a phrase will lodge in my
consciousness, for the mere moment required for it to recur, on a billboard, on
the side of a building, in someone’s remark. Every time, I’m baffled. What are the chances?
Perhaps I’m a connoisseur of coincidence? If you read more
than the average person, you take in that
many more words and impressions, which means that you’re more susceptible to
these echoes. But now I find myself actually anticipating the phenomena, the adumbration or repetition of a rare
word or thought, splendid in itself but doubly so when cloned.
Besides the pleasure to be derived from these incidents, I
also feel an occasional small shiver of terror. Just who is directing the
effects? Einstein said that coincidences were God’s way of remaining anonymous.
But: Taking the word coincidence
to mean the simultaneous occurrence of separate events, then there are an
almost infinite number of coincidences happening every second, aren’t there? An
individual’s consciousness is simply the mediator between these events, forging
connections that would not have existed otherwise.
Maybe the wonder is that coincidences don’t assail us at
every turn. I may flatter myself that I’m more finely attuned to them because
of my bustling mental life, but isn’t it probably the case that the man
preoccupied, so to speak, with fewer
thoughts would be more susceptible to coincidence, to the happenstance of one
event, out of the multitude of events impinging on his consciousness every
hour, lining up exactly with one of the thought-events in his head?
If you were to think about your high-school English teacher,
for example, were to maintain an image of her in your mind to the exclusion of
all other images, and then happened to cross paths with her, it would
constitute a coincidence, but not an extraordinary one. Even the instance of
two repetitions of the word fatuity, out of the thousands—millions?—of
fragmentary and fleeting thought-events occurring every day, coinciding and
then registering on one’s consciousness, while exceedingly more rare, is no
more fantastic.
No comments:
Post a Comment