Remember this guy? Kevin Spacey played Darrow |
"I am an agnostic;" Darrow said. "I do not pretend to know what many ignorant men are sure of."
Today's Deathless Verse:
The atheist knows he's no pigeon;
But non-belief's another religion.
An agnostic
is a doubter. Agnostic, when used as
an adjective, means doubting. Someone who is an agnostic on the subject of God
may doubt any or all of the myriad definitions or descriptions of God that have
been put forth since the human mind began to grapple with the puzzle of
existence. An agnostic may doubt the claims made on behalf of a god or gods,
such as “God created the world” or “God has a special interest in my day-to-day
well-being.” He may doubt such statements out of mere spite or perverseness,
but ideally he will base his doubt on evidence, or the lack of it.
An agnostic
is not quite an atheist. The atheist believes in the negation of what the
believer believes. He repudiates the idea of God, so for him all claims
presupposing the existence of God are untrue or nonsensical. It isn’t accurate
to say that an atheist is a nonbeliever; you have to say that he believes in
something which is the denial of what the believer believes, for without the
idea of God there would be no atheists. You could also say that the atheist is
just as credulous as the believer.
Thus, it
follows that the agnostic may doubt both what the believer believes and what
the atheist believes, with perfect consistency. Just as the claims of believers
can be doubted for insufficient evidence, so can the counter-claims of
atheists, on the same basis.
The atheist
will object, and say that the burden of proof falls on the believer. Using the
analogy of a criminal trial, he may liken the believer to a prosecuting
attorney, who must marshal his evidence to prove his case against the
defendant. This is fair enough, but it’s also accurate to say that in a court
trial the task of the defending party is to disprove the purported evidence in
order to prove innocence.
The weakness
of the argument is plain: in a trial, the combatants deal with facts, but in an
argument between believer and atheist, both sides traffic in conjecture. All
arguments about God, on whatever side, are simply guesses. Belief, no matter
how fervent, doesn’t constitute truth.
This being
the case, the agnostic is as entitled to his doubt—that is to say, to his
refusal to guess—as the believers on both sides are entitled to their
beliefs.
No comments:
Post a Comment